Why AI is a big problem for professional content producers, and why you will not see articles with any AI-generated content on this site
AI is now everywhere. Start writing an article using Microsoft Word, and it will encourage you to use its AI tool to help you write. Linked-In has been doing this for quite a while, which perhaps explains the very samey, repetitive tone of many of the posts there. If you cut and paste a section of someone else’s work, AI will offer to rewrite it for you, making plagiarism less traceable. AI can do quite a good job, too – below I have cut and pasted an article written by AI based on my prompt ; ‘write and article on the problems of cork taint in the wine trade, and potential solutions’. It isn’t a terrible article and for most content purposes, it will do. And it took less than a minute to complete.
This is bad news for content creators who get paid to write average content, largely to fill websites and help with SEO. With the low rates of pay from trade publications, you might imagine that some authors will seize the chance to up their productivity by incorporating AI into their workflow. But this is problematic.
If someone pays me to write, they want my words. It’s unethical to use AI at all in writing an article that I have my own byline on. I will not use it on this website: readers give me their time in an act of trust. They want to read what I have written.
Besides, AI isn’t accurate. The photograph above, of course, is AI generated. I asked Grok to create a picture of someone writing an article with AI help. This was one of the two pictures it generated. The dude is one of the lucky band of writers who has three hands: this really helps with productivity. Maybe the extra hand is symbolic of the help provided by AI?
I’m not anti-AI. It can be amazingly helpful – want to generate a meeting summary? It will save you ages. But for writing that I’m being paid to do, or for creating content that is then signed by me, I won’t use it, and I think its use should be disclosed.
The AI article
The Problem of Cork Taint in the Wine Industry
Challenges and Solutions
Introduction
Cork taint remains one of the most dreaded issues in the wine industry, causing a significant impact on both producers and consumers. This pervasive problem, often characterized by an unpleasant musty aroma, arises from the presence of certain compounds, the most notorious being 2,4,6-trichloroanisole (TCA). The phenomenon has sparked considerable debate and research, leading to innovative solutions aimed at mitigating its effects.
The Origin and Impact of Cork Taint
Cork taint primarily originates from natural corks used to seal wine bottles. TCA, the chemical compound responsible for the taint, is produced when fungi from the cork tree interact with chlorinated phenolic compounds, which can come from pesticides or industrial pollution. The compound is extremely potent, with even minute concentrations enough to spoil a bottle of wine.
The impact of cork taint extends beyond mere sensory displeasure. Economically, it results in significant losses for winemakers, who must replace tainted bottles and potentially face reputational damage. For consumers, encountering a corked wine can diminish their drinking experience and reduce their trust in the brand.
Sensory Characteristics
A wine affected by cork taint typically exhibits a damp, moldy odor reminiscent of wet cardboard or a musty basement. This olfactory defect overshadows the wine’s bouquet, rendering it unpalatable. The taste is equally compromised, with a muted flavor profile that fails to deliver the expected complexity and richness.
Prevalence
Studies suggest that around 3-5% of all bottled wines may be affected by cork taint. Although this percentage may appear small, it translates to millions of bottles annually, highlighting the scale of the problem.
Solutions to Cork Taint
The wine industry has adopted several strategies to tackle the issue of cork taint, ranging from alternative closures to advanced treatment methods.
Alternative Closures
One of the most effective measures has been the development and adoption of alternative closures. These include synthetic corks, screw caps, and glass stoppers.
- Synthetic Corks: Made from plastic or other synthetic materials, these corks do not harbor the fungi required for TCA production. They provide a reliable seal and are widely used in the industry.
- Screw Caps: Though initially met with skepticism, screw caps have gained favor for their ability to provide an airtight seal, preventing oxidation and contamination. They are particularly popular in regions like Australia and New Zealand.
- Glass Stoppers: Glass closures offer an elegant and effective solution, ensuring a perfect seal and eliminating the risk of cork taint. However, their higher cost can be a limiting factor.
Improved Cork Production and Treatment
The cork industry itself has also taken steps to address the problem. Improved harvesting and processing techniques have reduced the incidence of TCA contamination.
- Supercritical CO₂ Treatment: This method uses supercritical carbon dioxide to extract TCA and other contaminants from natural corks, significantly reducing the risk of taint.
- Steam Cleaning: Advanced steam cleaning processes can remove TCA from corks, ensuring that they are free from contamination before use.
- Quality Control: Rigorous quality control measures, including sensory and chemical testing, help identify and eliminate tainted corks before they reach winemakers.
Technological Innovations
Emerging technologies have provided new avenues for detecting and preventing cork taint.
- Electronic Noses: Devices mimicking the human sense of smell, electronic noses can detect TCA at extremely low levels, allowing for early identification and removal of tainted corks.
- Advanced Material Science: Research into new materials and coatings that can be applied to natural corks to prevent the formation of TCA is ongoing, offering hope for future solutions.
Conclusion
Cork taint is a persistent challenge in the wine industry, but advancements in technology, alternative closures, and improved production methods have provided effective solutions. By continuing to innovate and embrace new approaches, the industry can reduce the prevalence of cork taint, ensuring that consumers enjoy their wine as intended. While the battle against cork taint may never be entirely won, the efforts to mitigate its effects demonstrate the resilience and adaptability of the wine industry.